What are the recommendations that have been made by the commissioner herself? Is that cost allowed to be awarded where there is abuse? I'm wondering if you have any thoughts on whether court costs should be awarded to the successful defendant, the person who's succeeded in protecting their reputation, but at tremendous cost, usually as a result of hiring lawyers to defend them?
Do you think the allowance of awarding costs to the persons who have successfully defended themselves should extend beyond simply cases of abuse and perhaps to other cases where it was not necessarily frivolous, but it would provide a deterrent from those people who might bring frivolous cases?