Well, I think it's happening both ways. As part of the Universal Periodic Review process, specific consultations were held with civil society and aboriginal groups. Then, I would suggest, any department that has leadership around a certain policy domain has its own processes about how it engages its stakeholders in those policy consultations and discussions. So yes, in many cases, I suspect, our colleagues in civil society have a number of doors right now that they have to knock on to present their views and make their recommendations around where the policy is going to go.
The role varies. As I said, it's very rare that Canadian Heritage is going to have a policy lead on the areas that are usually covered in the Universal Periodic Review. You will note that most of our leads are dealing with process, not content. There may be a way to enlarge the discussions through the consultation we want to have around the process. Without a change in mandate from ministers, the continuing committee is not a policy body and it won't be acting as one, that's for sure.