I don't know whether any of them were involved with the coup. But as I said, for the past eight months or so, it appears there is beginning to be a stronger line against those who are against the government. In 2007 we started with not extending the licence of Radio Caracas. The licence doesn't have to be extended, as you said; there's no law that says you have to extend the licence.
But with the 34 stations last year, if you put that together with those people who have been recently arrested, the judiciary has been used to detain and to punish them, and the evidence we have is that it's mainly for political reasons, you start to ask--and again, I think this is not only the position of Amnesty International, but the position of the special rapporteur in the Inter-American Commission on Freedom of Expression and also UN bodies--why these stations have been looked at. Is it because of their editorial line, or because administratively they were not doing things the right way?