Evidence of meeting #20 for Subcommittee on International Human Rights in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was taliban.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Massouda Jalal  First female candidate for presidency in Afghanistan and former Minister of Women's Affairs, As an Individual

9:45 a.m.

First female candidate for presidency in Afghanistan and former Minister of Women's Affairs, As an Individual

Dr. Massouda Jalal

The agenda that the international community introduced--and they had some arguments in the first months of 2010 in London--is to reintegrate the Taliban and for more Afghanization of the processes. Peace and security is a priority, while human rights, women's rights, and civil society issues were put at the back.

This means that the Government of Afghanistan, starting from 2006, has been less and less responsive to human rights cases. They feel that the international community has agreed with them that peace and security should be the first thing. Under the name of peace and security, they are often bringing in more fundamentalism, and fascistic activities are going on in regard to the superiority of certain ethnicities in the countries.

So as for where this energy that has been gifted by the international community for democracy and liberalism in Afghanistan is going, it's going to these kinds of interests inside the country, and there is not enough monitoring and supervision of these issues. A mafia over the power has been created and the international community is completely blind to that because it is behind the curtains. They cannot see it.

Wayne Marston NDP Hamilton East—Stoney Creek, ON

There is a possibility, though, that when they're talking about establishing peace and security, it's peace and security to a level where they can withdraw and disengage. So their primary goal is to get out rather than to complete the job in the sense of democratic reforms that are needed.

The warlords you talk about, are they aligned with the Taliban?

9:50 a.m.

First female candidate for presidency in Afghanistan and former Minister of Women's Affairs, As an Individual

Dr. Massouda Jalal

By ideology, yes. They have the same ideology. There's no difference within their ideologies; they can get together in one night. When they were in competition, they had no power. They were struggling for power. Before this, they were fighting for political power and now they are together, as we can see. The former president, the predecessor of Karzai, was Rabanni. Rabanni announced full support for Taliban engagement, with political power, but before that, he was fighting them.

Ten years ago, Rabanni was taken away from Kabul as president to a province in the northern part of Afghanistan, bordering with Tajikistan. He was receiving support from the Russians to fight the Taliban. He fought the Taliban for five years. But after the international community came in, he was replaced by President Karzai. So he fought for five years in a military advance against the Taliban, but now he has announced that he is friendly with them and is completely supporting their engagement in political power.

Why? Because their source of feeding is the same: it is extremist funding sources in Arabic countries for the Taliban and also for the warlords. We call them warlords; it's the same.... So the master told both of them that they had to be together to get the political power of Afghanistan, and with the energy of some countries, with the money of their technical assistance or whatever assistance they give, make an extremist government and put the name “democracy” on it. That's why he announced that, yes, he wanted the Taliban to come.

So you see what the machination behind it is: they only want to use the funding. Behind the curtains, they're together. They're brothers. And they run their own agenda. They don't let any woman activist with the vision of real human rights in Afghanistan and democracy and liberalism go further in working in Afghanistan, because they are enemies.

You know they're enemies. In the philosophy of religious dictatorship, there's no space for women, so that is why women are targeted by them, too. That's why I say that the international community or international sources are needed to support women activists inside Afghanistan politically, so that they can survive there, be protected, and be working on women's rights for a positive change in the country.

I wanted to do that, but in 2002 the international community didn't know me. I became a candidate through my own individual popularity. I was a social activist, and I was working directly with thousands and hundreds of thousands of people, helping them to receive aid from the United Nations. That's why they knew me and supported me. They're normal people. But the international community in 2002 didn't know me. I was telling everybody that if this chance is given to women, I can do this for Afghanistan, with honesty.

I knew that our powerful men were dealers, and they have become very experienced in political business. They make money. It is my second day in Ottawa and I have heard from many Afghans. I knew about these people in Afghanistan and they didn't have a house in Afghanistan; I knew about the personal and family lives of many of the leaders in Afghanistan. But I've heard that they are buying properties in Canada, with millions of dollars. That's why I started thinking that if we women in Afghanistan get power, we will start investigating their personal properties and get all these national properties that they have taken away from these countries back to the Afghan national treasury.

I've just heard that the head of the office of President Karzai has bought a house in Vancouver worth $1 million: a one-million dollar house here for a person who didn't have a house in Kabul before. So in eight years, the head of the office can do that.

So you can see that a lot of the money that has been handed to Afghanistan and the national income of Afghanistan have been misused because of the absence of rule of law in the country; it has been taken away to different banks of the world and also to countries like this one. This is another source of income for Afghanistan that can be investigated and can be taken to the national treasury of Afghanistan.

Also, the warlords and extremist leaders have millions of dollars, so we have a national source, and if we have a strong government, and your countries, your governments, and the UN can support us, the UN, together with the Afghan government, can start an investigation of the personal properties of these warlords, these commanders, and these extremist leaders.

All the people of Afghanistan know that their fathers' lives, their personal lives, three decades back, were very poor, and they don't have to anymore say to people how they made it: they were fighting for jihad, and jihad is in the name of Allah. But how did this richness happen? This means that it is the people's property so they should return it. The UN started in a previous administration nine years ago, but then it was stopped. The UN started asking the different banks of the world about the property of extremist leaders, but suddenly it stopped.

That process can be taken ahead again. How many properties and how much money do they have in different parts of the world? It can be investigated, and they can go to court and defend themselves, and if they can't--and obviously they cannot--they should be punished and should go to prison, and the properties that belong to the people of Afghanistan should go to the national treasury. That is a very big income for Afghanistan.

I've heard about one extremist leader having $20 million--$20 million--in a bank outside Afghanistan. That's only one of them. So if you put all of them together, it's hundreds of millions of dollars, and that could make Afghanistan reconstructed. All these desires we have to be free and liberated, with lawfulness, a shining, happy and healthy Afghanistan, a democratic Afghanistan, all we want can be done with that, with our property that was taken away from the people of Afghanistan.

Thank you.

Wayne Marston NDP Hamilton East—Stoney Creek, ON

Thank you.

9:55 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Scott Reid

I let you go significantly over the allotted time because it was our witness talking rather than a questioner. To allow a last round of questions from the Conservative members, I'm going to see the clock as being at seven minutes before the hour.

We'll begin with Mr. Hiebert, please.

9:55 a.m.

Conservative

Russ Hiebert Conservative South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale, BC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I'll be sharing my time with my colleague.

Thank you, Dr. Jalal, for being here and for giving us an update on the status of democracy in Afghanistan.

During your presentation, you talked a fair bit about the state of the parliamentary system within the country. It got me thinking about the progress that has been made in the last decade. Ten years ago, before the international community got involved in your nation, would you have been free to be a candidate for election?

10 a.m.

First female candidate for presidency in Afghanistan and former Minister of Women's Affairs, As an Individual

Dr. Massouda Jalal

No, of course not. It was Taliban time. I might not have been permitted to go outside the house without a male guardian. I was not able to show my face. I was not able to work. I didn't have the opportunity of learning something if I wanted. I was not able to take part in economic, political, social, and cultural life. That's all. I was to stay at home taking care of the children and that's all.

10 a.m.

Conservative

Russ Hiebert Conservative South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale, BC

So there has been a dramatic change.

10 a.m.

First female candidate for presidency in Afghanistan and former Minister of Women's Affairs, As an Individual

Dr. Massouda Jalal

By law, women are permitted to take part, and it is in the constitution of 2003; it is done, yes. By law they're allowed, but by the opportunities we have to create for them, it has been a challenge. The enforcement of the law has been a challenge.

As I've just said in my paper, there are things against the constitution of Afghanistan. For instance, in the eastern region of Afghanistan, the Ulema council announced that no woman can go out without a guardian, so again there is this restriction on movement. Different restrictions are taking place. Threats and security problems are taking girls out of school and taking teachers back home, not to work. Problems are occurring again and again with restrictions and limitations on women's lives and movement.

10 a.m.

Conservative

Russ Hiebert Conservative South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale, BC

In respect of strengthening the parliamentary system of democracy in your country, what do you think needs to happen internally for there to be free and fair elections and for there to be free and proper democratic procedures between elections?

10 a.m.

First female candidate for presidency in Afghanistan and former Minister of Women's Affairs, As an Individual

Dr. Massouda Jalal

The Government of Afghanistan, together with the commission of elections, should make sure that the process is transparent. In this way, we can have mobilization of people, men and woman, and all can take part. Then we can have better elections than what we had before.

But this government themselves cheated: in the last elections, in 2004 and 2009, for the presidential and provincial councils, one million votes were cheated votes. The commission, together with the government, did that. Now, how much can we trust them? It's the same government and commission; it's the same people. They cheated, and now the frustration among people in regard to voting is strong, because of the way this was done.

10 a.m.

Conservative

David Sweet Conservative Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale, ON

Thank you, Dr. Jalal.

You've mentioned the peace jirga, but I want to ask you about the other jirgas. They were originally designed to be an outreach, but you're saying that this activity is actually disempowering parliament. It's changing the landscape of power.

10 a.m.

First female candidate for presidency in Afghanistan and former Minister of Women's Affairs, As an Individual

10 a.m.

Conservative

David Sweet Conservative Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale, ON

Canada, through CIDA, and the United States government, through USAID, have made investments in the democratic training of parliamentarians and the judiciary. You told my colleague that there had been substantial advancement, but that in the last few years there had also been a substantial degradation in rights.

10 a.m.

First female candidate for presidency in Afghanistan and former Minister of Women's Affairs, As an Individual

Dr. Massouda Jalal

The transitional justice that was decided on in the Bonn agreement of 2001 was not implemented. That is creating gaps. Transitional justice was to be implemented so that all the warlords, extremist leaders, and war criminals would have gone to court by now.

Instead of sending them to court, we sent them to parliament, to cabinet, and to political power, so the power is in their hands. They make laws of impunity for themselves and influence the democratization process more and more in their own favour.

The mistake was that transitional justice was not implemented. Instead, we gave them the political power to remake Afghanistan the way they wanted through energy from outside. Now we're even adding to that by bringing in the extremist Taliban and bribing them by giving them power.

David Sweet Conservative Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale, ON

One of the things I've heard in your testimony is that there are no moderate Taliban.

10:05 a.m.

First female candidate for presidency in Afghanistan and former Minister of Women's Affairs, As an Individual

Dr. Massouda Jalal

No. It's only the names that are given to convince the international community. It's only names. It doesn't have any reality behind it. There is no “moderate Taliban” or “severe extremist Taliban”. These are all just names they use when they have a request for the international community, to convince the international community to do something.

Otherwise, our warlords, our extremist groups that are inside power right now, plus the Taliban, they are all the same. They are all the same. They are fundamentalist. They want dictatorship, logistical dictatorship, in Afghanistan. And they are doing it with the help of democracies....

10:05 a.m.

Conservative

David Sweet Conservative Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale, ON

We probably have some good conjectures here, but for my last question, you made the comment that the master told them both to get together. You were talking about the warlords and the Taliban. I assume you meant their funding partners.

10:05 a.m.

First female candidate for presidency in Afghanistan and former Minister of Women's Affairs, As an Individual

10:05 a.m.

Conservative

David Sweet Conservative Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale, ON

Could you name those countries that are doing that?

10:05 a.m.

First female candidate for presidency in Afghanistan and former Minister of Women's Affairs, As an Individual

Dr. Massouda Jalal

Well, if I have power, I can find them out. Because it needs some machinery to find them out, to discover that, but we can understand that they have very good funders. I mean, the activities they are doing inside Afghanistan...they open a TV channel very easily, and with the radio stations, TV stations, newsletters, magazines, and media power they have, it is very easy for them.

When there is an election, they are so rich, and they spend money for their own candidates to succeed. Also, when there are powerful positions in the government, they buy them; they bribe with very big money. They have so much money that they buy and they give money to the people who look after them to buy houses in certain strategic political points of Kabul and other cities, our lands, placing their party members there.

Also, we see them making political parties within one night, registering them in the government and producing organizations, and they are producing this kind of work very easily, so we can easily understand that there are powerful sources behind them that are funding them enormously. On the other hand, they have made the mafia of power. One brother is doing this business on politics, while the other brother has a construction company and is getting contracts from the American and international community military sources. The next brother.... It's because they have money and they can show their money in their bank account.

There is one criterion: you must have $10 million to get this project worth $40 million on the construction of roads. Of course, who has the money to get the project? It is the brother of that warlord. So the brother of that warlord dresses and shaves very well. He dresses himself very well, with a tie, yes? And he goes to the source—for instance, the military base of the Americans—and gets the projects.

You see, they are getting all the economic opportunities inside Afghanistan. Normal people cannot compete. That is why normal people of Afghanistan have not been empowered. If they enjoy some of the services that have become better through this nine years from their government, that's all for them: this freedom by law to work or get an education, these general services. For the rest, economic opportunity is in the hands of extremism in Afghanistan.

The liberal democrat individuals who came from Canada and America to Afghanistan are technocrats. These technocrats, when they saw these people with this enormous amount of money, they went into partnership with them. For instance, we have a warlord in Afghanistan who is the deputy president. His name is Fahim.

Fahim is now a wealthy person, so the president brought him as the deputy president because of that wealth. Why? It is because the brothers of the president, with the brothers of Marshal Fahim, went into partnership for economic initiatives, buying the mines of Afghanistan, with an international partner, so that made them come together and become president and deputy president.

So what about women? You know that we cannot compete at all.

And what about normal people, civil society? Never. They can never compete. I mean, now that the classes are made and the first class is the warlords and extremist leaders and their families, and our technocrats from the west, because of the money, they went into partnership with them to get economic benefits.... Civil society and women remain unable to get opportunities, apart from small opportunities of working here and there, not the big opportunities or the economic power.

Now they have control over economic power and political power. If there is no decision made and they go on like this, the future of Afghanistan, the political power and determination of who should have it, will be in the hands of people who have the economic power. Those who have the economic power are the extremist families and leaders and warlords. If Parliament is coming, okay, their leaders will be holding the economic power too.

So in future elections, the candidates of this group of people will be the winners, like Karzai was the winner of this last election from the beginning, because of their support. The international community was supporting him because he spoke good English. He was known as somebody who had lived in Virginia in the U.S., who had a U.S. green card and family who lived there for three decades. Those were his credits, and he is a soft and well-behaved man, so he got the international community's credit and trust.

But internally who helped him? Internally, extremism helped him. He went into a partnership with extremists to share power with them. He told them he was the one who would never implement transitional justice; I hear Karzai himself say all the time, Say thanks to God”, to the extremists. It is Karzai who is not putting in this court, so he says, “Support me”. This is the deal inside Afghanistan.

He is right. He's honest with them. He's honest. He's doing it. I mean, transitional justice was not implemented, and this gap was created. And all of these problems we are confronting today and on which the international community is losing their way on how and where to go is because of that.

If we do transitional justice, we will have treated the disease, even if it is postponed or late. If we take the criminals to court, investigate their personal properties, and return the personal properties to the national treasury, together with the UN and the Government of Afghanistan, that will be the way out.

But the Government of Afghanistan now is too much in the hands of extremists. There is nobody--or you cannot find anybody--to raise this with. And there is no machinery to do this, because now all of the members of these parties and groups are members of the government. So now it's not possible.

But when the international community came in first in 2001, all of these extremists were shivering. They were in shock because they were expecting that human rights values would be implemented and that their criminality would be proven before the International Court in The Hague. That was the general mentality of Afghans. But six months later, two years later, and then little by little, their fear was gone and they became courageous enough to stand on their feet and to do what they want.

10:10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Scott Reid

Thank you very much.

Mario Silva Liberal Davenport, ON

Chair, could I just make one quick announcement?

10:10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Scott Reid

Yes, please do, Mr. Silva.

Mario Silva Liberal Davenport, ON

I just want to let members know that Dr. Jalal will be speaking this Wednesday to all members of Parliament from 3 to 4 in Room 306, West Block. Members are more than welcome to invite all of their colleagues to attend that meeting as well.