Yes, so that means Friday in the case of a Tuesday meeting and Tuesday in the case of a Thursday meeting. I guess we should make sure that everybody has your e-mail address. They can send it in to you if they want to send it that way. So we'll just make sure that everybody gets....
We also have a list of correspondence received, a list of witnesses that has been submitted vis-à-vis our ongoing Venezuela hearings, a list of witnesses who have appeared vis-à-vis the Venezuela hearings, and finally the calendar. I think we can safely go through the correspondence and the witnesses, and then I think we'll do the calendar in camera.
Before we get to the correspondence, much of which asks us to undertake one or another set of hearings, I do want to remind people that we had three criteria that we had informally agreed ought to guide us. These do not bind us, but there seemed to be some consensus on using these three rules in choosing our subjects for discussion. One was, is it something on which we think we can achieve a consensus, as opposed to having to vote on it? That's not binding, but it was something we seemed to agree on. Secondly, is it something we can get done in a timely fashion, given the fact that we never know when the next election is going to be and there's no point in doing a study that will result in us not having completed some work prior to the next election. Thirdly, is it an area where Canada can have an influence? Obviously there are some areas where we're more influential than others.
So those are the three criteria we had discussed. They're not binding upon us, but they seemed to be items on which we had some agreement.
All right. We turn now to the correspondence received. You have a considerable package here. I'll go through these things in order without comment.
