Coming back to the UPR and Canada's response to the UPR, to my understanding, neither document has been tabled in the House. So they're not in the hands of members.
I'd like to highlight a couple of things from the UPR. First of all, concerns that were raised about Canada's treatment of aboriginal and indigenous peoples were by Switzerland, Austria, Norway, Mexico, the Netherlands, Finland, United Kingdom, and India. Concerns about actions on the optional protocol to the convention on torture were by Chile, Brazil, France, and Denmark.
When we start looking at the validity of some of the concerns raised, they're being raised by folks with whom we have been allies for a long time, and hopefully this committee will reach a point where they will listen to you, and some of the other presenters we're about to have, on ways we can improve the work of the continuing committee.
You mentioned Norway and the United Kingdom in your remarks as being fairly progressive. Would they, or others, be countries we could turn to for some examples of perhaps changes we might make?