Thank you for a very thorough presentation. I took lots of notes. I honestly don't have a lot of questions, because you've done a good job of answering most of them.
What are the arguments against the changes proposed in Bill C-483? I'm getting the sense that there's support around the table, and perhaps broader than that. But what could somebody say against the idea of extending the State Immunity Act to these officials who have permitted or instructed these atrocities to occur?