Very briefly, the only other point I would emphasize, as Leilani did, is about the continuing committee.
Yes, it could and it should be improved in many ways, especially with respect to transparency. It's also vital to recognize its limits. It is not what is needed to solve the bigger picture here around political accountability, true coordination at a meaningful level amongst governments. It is an information-sharing vehicle. It is a level at which some good discussions can happen about some legal issues around what does this or that treaty mean. And we should have something like that in Canada, but it's not where the decisions are going to happen, it's not where resource issues are going to be worked out, and it's not where political struggles between federal and provincial levels as to who is going to bear responsibility for this or that issue will be worked out, either.