Absolutely.
I mean, even if the committee shouldn't be struck down entirely, they self-describe as a communications protocol. Well, I don't hear “implementation”, I don't hear “action”. They disseminate information, that's all. And in this day and age, with the Internet, we can all do that. You don't even need a committee for that.
The committee is not functioning in a role of implementation at all. But I do think the lack of transparency, the secrecy, etc., is phenomenal, and that would be a first step. Who are the committee members? When do they meet? Isn't there a space for civil society to join at some point? Isn't there some dialogue we could be having?