I will take advantage of the fact that Mr. Sweet has only used up four of his seven minutes, both in questions and answers. I just want to ask the following.
The impression I got from looking at the periodic review of Canada is that its most valuable parts tended to indicate, not that Canada was engaging in human rights abuses in the sense of the abuses that we tend to deal with at this committee, in that we don't have arbitrary arrests and executions in Canada, and those sorts of thing, but that there were issues at the administrative level, in particular.
One that stands out in my mind as being mentioned by a number of the countries that had reviewed Canada's performance is the treatment of aboriginals once they get caught up inside the justice system. All of this suggest to me--I guess I'm in danger of putting words in your mouth, so correct me if you think I'm on the wrong track—that the problem is not the lack of a ministry of human rights, either at the federal or provincial level, but the absence of proper enforcement mechanisms to ensure the law is meted out in equal measure, that equal benefit of the law is provided to all persons once they are within the apparatus of the government and, if you like, to some degree, at the mercy of the apparatus of government.