The reason I asked that question is that it gets to some motivations on how we can resolve this issue. To me, it's would be a bit different if there were complicit interactions because of some history. I think you're aware of some evidence that the MEK also dealt with the Saddam Hussein regime. At least that's what the Iraqi government is saying now.
I guess what I'm saying is this. Do you think the motivation is due to that history they claim, or is it due to a clear and present danger from Iran?