Okay.
I was just wondering if the real reason is that it's an organization that's been labelled as a terrorist organization. I don't understand how there can be a reason not to intervene in a process like this? Is the only reason the United States is not intervening is that it is still labelled as a terrorist organization? Would that play into the United Nations' decision not to intervene or not to have any resolutions?
I'm just trying to understand the situation over here. It's labelled by the United States as a terrorist organization. It has been taken off the lists of England and Europe. What are the criteria for this labelling? Do you believe, listed or not, that this designation has anything whatsoever to do with whether the international community should intervene to assist those refugees or not?