I have just a couple of points, and then, of course, my colleague from Public Safety is the expert on delisting.
You talk about the inconsistencies, and I think on the surface one could say there was inconsistency among the positions of Canada, the U.S., and a few others and that of some of the Europeans. However, I would point out that the decision among the Europeans to delist was made on the basis of a judicial review because of a procedural issue, in terms of the availability of evidence that was given to the MeK itself. I think European governments are still concerned about the intent and the activities of the group.
Secondly, you talk about acts of war. I'm not sure that attacking people, civilians, is considered justified in any context, even within war. I'm also not so sure that attacking the Iranian embassy in Ottawa is considered an act of war and is justified. So there are—