I was going to quickly add something about the 2% tax.
In the U.K., where I come from, people access different types of benefits: disability, job seeker's allowance, and so on. These benefits are how U.K. taxpayers help the disadvantaged. But then those people have to pay £80 per year, for example, and they are asked to produce proof of benefit, which is proof of a disability living allowance. Otherwise, they do not get any clearance.
It's an extortion; it's not a tax.
We are not against paying tax to our country if the money is used toward helping our people build schools and clinics and toward developing the country. But we know that the money goes to al-Shabaab, the money goes to arm the neighbouring countries' opposition. That's what we are objecting to. For example, when I speak about how the U.K. taxpayers' money ended up with al-Shabaab, it's not a made-up story. The UN monitoring group compiled a report, but in my own research and from talking to my people...they said we were training those people.
So it is a fact, based on honest and credible information.
Thank you.