Well, it's part of a process of politicization of the judiciary, as I was mentioning in regard to your other question, and I think political loyalties weigh more in the balance than professionalism does. Therefore, you begin to see senior judges who may have risen because of their loyalties to the leader rather than their competence. That, I think, tends to distort their perception on cases, as we've seen in some instances.
In the UPR context, I guess it is encouraging in the sense that they did accept some of those. But we also have to monitor now to continue to ensure that they actually abide by them. I must say, in the UPR, I think the countries that do present and get critiqued tend to take the process quite seriously. Whether they implement everything is another story.