Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I have one last question in order to really make sure we have enough on the record. The bishop was just mentioning that he feels that some training that has happened—or at least some directives that have happened to security forces—were really to insulate them from any kind of prosecution they might face if they themselves were to be involved in human rights infractions.
But I wanted to ask this, or maybe it's almost rhetoric at this point. You're saying that after the universal periodic review, where there was a recommendation for the security forces to be trained in regard to human rights, the appropriate behaviour to ensure individual citizens' human rights, they instead simply chose this directive to insulate themselves rather than actually training the people? In essence, this made no difference other than maybe making them wiser in their pursuit of these infractions. Is that what you're saying?