Let me just rephrase it.
We had been one of those at the forefront of having the responsibility to protect doctrine invoked and then applied at the United Nations itself. Is there any change in our policy with respect to that position? I seem to sense in the responses that there may have been a change, which is fair, as governments are entitled to have changes.
But I sense in the fact that there's no direct response to the question as to whether we still support the responsibility to protect doctrine, and whether we would support it with respect to North Korea, that there appears to be an equivocation on this.