Thank you.
The writ of amparo, a novel legal mechanism, was employed by the Supreme Court precisely to stem the tide of extrajudicial killings in the Philippines. Our largest human rights organization in the Philippines, the National Union of Peoples' Lawyers, actually supported the Supreme Court's initiative on that, and there were a few victories initially. In fact, the first two cases filed by human rights lawyers, when the writ of amparo was promulgated in September 2007, were victorious. The disappeared were surfaced by the military.
Unfortunately, the military began to study ways to get around the writ of amparo, and because of ignorance and possible corruption on the part of lower judges in the Philippines, the writ of amparo, I have to sadly admit, has begun to lose its effectiveness. Now the writ of amparo being granted, which is a akin to a writ of habeas corpus, is no longer of major significance, so that is an unfortunate development.
With regard to the United Nations, I am informed that there have been various intimations from special rapporteurs, not only from the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances, but from other rapporteurs on the rights of indigenous peoples, women and children. However, the Philippine government, as far as I know, has not yet extended an invitation, and as we all know, the United Nations cannot come in as long as there is no invitation from the Philippine government.
It would be good to have comprehensive action by the UN or countries from abroad, but the UN aspect is not moving forward. That is why missions from other countries could probably take its place because that's less regulated, in a way, compared to the United Nations.