It is a great statement. We are aware to some extent, and maybe it just needs embellishment so that you better understand what the statement means.
Often in other countries' communities, there's a belief that the local communities should get a lion's share of the benefits associated with resources extracted from the immediate area. That's not the case with Eritrea. They believe that it's a national resource, and accordingly the local communities shouldn't disproportionately benefit.
Actually, they do, because the communities that are closer have much higher employment and opportunity.
But as to what they do with the funds, again, if that's really what you're getting at, we're not in the position to influence that, and we don't think we should.