He had great sympathy for me, Mr. Chair, as you did in allowing my intervention a few minutes ago.
I really am troubled by what I heard about our embassy staff not delivering the services that, as a Canadian citizen, you deserve. There should be nothing more involved than that statement that you're a Canadian citizen. You should have got the appropriate supports. Hopefully, that's not indicative of anything beyond the mistakes of one individual, but I am concerned. I share some of your concerns.
The other thing I got from your testimony is that Canada did not give a significant intervention in the United Nations Universal Periodic Review of Indonesia, which sounds like something that we should have done. Again, I'd have to see that particular report to get a sense of involvement in it, but I agree that it is a mechanism that's there to draw attention to circumstances like these. In Indonesia, it sounds like getting the story out seems to be one of the serious problems, and that could well be part of the answer.
I'm not so sure I agree with you about the new Office of Religious Freedom in Canada, because, like you, I believe in a secular approach to things, and I'm still wrestling with that particular office until I see more definition of it.
In Aceh province, you have I believe 98% Muslims in that particular part of the country, and they seem to be Muslims attacking Muslims there, if we start looking at the human rights violations. That's part of what prompted me to take that question to you before—via the chair, as I did—about how much of this is power politics instead of religious-based activities. How much of this is about the leadership and the forces that control that country protecting their own interests as opposed to actually being religion driven...?