Thank you very much, Professor Brown.
I just want to push a button there that was left for me. You mentioned in your answer to my colleague, Mr. Marston, that you feel there's less religious tension except when an argument breaks out and then it kind of morphs into a religious argument. For generations the Coptic community has been suppressed by not being able to have the same jobs as others in Egypt, by not being able to own property in specific places and only being able to own in certain circumstances. They even have to ask permission to do repairs or upgrades to their church and so on.
Is it so much that it morphs into a religious argument, or is it that because of the in-built suppression of the behaviour of what I would call religious castes that these arguments don't break out as long as they stay in their place?