I would say that there are, I guess, different kinds of risks. There's certainly a risk of our wasting money. Certainly, for those of us who are doing this work, we don't want to waste our time and our money working in places where they're not delivering. We're very adamant about this. We will say to them that if they're not prepared to commit to what we're agreeing to, we're walking away. We put a lot of pressure on them because we're very careful and very conscious that this is Canadian money, so why should we throw it away? That's a risk around the money issue.
Where it gets more delicate, I think, is when you get into some of the more sophisticated technologies like wiretap. In the case of Honduras, it's the Americans who have been getting involved in that, not Canada. You can say things can be used for more than one purpose. This was a concern that happened in Guatemala, at one point, with one attorney general, but the result of it was that people put pressure on and they were able to deal with it.
I personally believe this work is complicated. This work is not without its risks, but I do think we have far more to gain as a country by being involved. We do have a different approach than our neighbours from the south, and I think we're viewed differently that way. I think we have opportunities to do things that some others can't. To me, there's risk, and something could go sideways, there's no doubt about that. At the same time, we're close enough to them, we're working close enough, that at least we have a window on this.
That's all I can say.