As I said with respect to the mining industry, the mining industry is not a major employer of people. It won't be a major employer of Hondurans. It's too capital-intensive an industry. It leads to greater displacement and dislocation of people, which can't possibly be compensated for by employment in the mining sector.
With respect to Gildan and its operations in Honduras, from the people I've spoken with—and I know you've heard testimony from Karen Spring—and the different reports I've read about Honduras about Gildan there, I would say it meets the standards of sweatshop labour based on the working conditions that people describe to me, the injuries people working there have described to me, and so on. I think it's not that Hondurans don't want jobs—obviously they do—but they want jobs that they would describe as fair, as having dignity.
I think the majority of Hondurans would prefer the development of a nascent sector that is much more tied to the broader development of Honduras, in which jobs would be much stronger and more widespread. That's not possible in an enclave maquila export processing zone, because it's not set up to provide for the broader development of Honduras. It's simply not. They've displaced the industry that was set up to do that.