I'll have one cut at it and I'm sure Colonel Martin will have his views as well.
In essence the UN has a whole series of challenges as well as personnel inside Iraq trying to help rebuild Iraq after the U.S. invasion there. Ambassador Kobler's predecessor, who for many years was responsible for this whole situation for UNAMI, was a gentlemen who got into very hot water with the Iraqis because he called out the Iraqi election as not being free and fair. He got forcibly removed from his position as a result of that.
The instructions that were given to Martin Kobler were to go make nice with the Iraqis. It was clear to Ambassador Kobler...and we know this information, by the way. I'm not sure if your committee has heard from this individual, but you might want to. The information I'm about to share with you comes from a UN whistleblower, a guy named Tahar Boumedra, an international human rights lawyer who only worked in the UN system for the latter five to ten years of his career. Before that he was involved as an Algerian in staffing the Algerian judge to the International Court of Justice and running some of the law journals with the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights on human rights law in Africa. He was Kobler's right hand through all of this and he has come out and said in essence that it was the top priority of the Iraqis, on behalf of their masters in Tehran, to go after the residents of Camp Ashraf at the time.
Therefore a plan was developed in collaboration with the Iraqis to put the pressure on them. The exchange would be, in essence, that the UN would get some of the other things that it wanted out of the Iraqis on a range of other important issues. So Kobler made a political calculation, according to Tahar Boumedra. He was following orders from New York to make nice with al-Maliki by giving him something that to the UN, while it is an issue of some concern and it obviously is a major human rights issue, was not as high a priority as a range of other issues that the UN had in Iraq.
So what was to gain politically was favour with al-Maliki, buying favour with al-Maliki by repressing the residents of Camp Ashraf. Even the whole move from Ashraf to Liberty was political, it had nothing to do with humanitarian exigencies. The claims of the Government of Iraq were that these people couldn't be interviewed because it wouldn't be viewed as an independent interview by UNHCR if they were interviewed in Camp Ashraf, even though it was held by the Iraqis, and even though FOB Grizzly, which is one of the U.S. operating bases there, was walled off separately and interviews could have been conducted there a mile or two away and otherwise.
Let me just mention very briefly that in essence al-Maliki insisted they be moved because Tehran was saying that because of the symbolism of Ashraf—which has been there for 30 years—to the Iranian resistance, it has to be shut down. So therefore, based on these kinds of arbitrary determinations, all of them had to be moved to Camp Liberty.