That is our Achilles heel. It is clear that the police will not have the capacity to investigate, because those who commit human rights violations are members of the police. They're authorities. They're state agents. Rather than searching for evidence, they clear the scene of the crime. That's one point.
The other point is that the public authorities allow this to happen. Furthermore, the judiciary does not have credibility because it is not independent. I'm not trying to say that they don't know or don't have sufficient knowledge; it's that they're not independent. They act and hand down decisions, but they decide who they will punish. If they receive the order to set someone free or not to bring them to account even though there may be proof against them, the judiciary must let them go free. That's the problem, because there is state corruption. That corruption doesn't just mean money grabbing. It is also manipulation with regard to what the public receives, and in this case it's information. So there is no credibility because of those who have guaranteed impunity in Honduras. It's a very serious situation, and they themselves refer to this.
Perhaps we do not have to start from scratch, but we do have to see how we can reconfigure the state's public institutions and how we can ensure that citizens act to show that crimes are being committed, and that there is some kind of obligation to punish those crimes. Corruption also takes that shape. Our justice system has virtually collapsed.