Thank you, Mr. Chair, for the opportunity to appear before you today to testify on one of the most timely and critical issues facing us, sexual violence as a weapon of war in the ongoing Syrian conflict.
It's timely, because the international community is failing in its obligation to protect civilians in times of war from crimes against humanity, particularly rape, and other forms of sexual violence, which continue to be used as weapons of war in the ongoing armed conflict in Syria and other places in the world.
Since the beginning of the Syrian civil war in March 2011, the international community, symbolized by the UN Security Council, has done less than nothing to condemn or to stop the commission of crimes against humanity, particularly wartime rape and other forms of sexual violence, allegedly committed by all factions in the conflict, but chiefly by the Syrian official forces and the pro-government paramilitaries, in Arabic, shabbeeh, and the Hezbollah troops, against Syrian civilians.
The laxity and double standards shown by the UN Security Council in addressing the Syrian and other international crises are due to the failure of international political will and the lack of interest on the part of the major players. It's shocking that the international community was able to reach an agreement with the regime in so short a period of time to remove its chemical weapons while completely failing to save the lives of millions of innocent children, women, and elderly people throughout Syria over the past three years. This situation reminds me of Senator Dallaire's critical question: are we all human, or are some more human than others?
It's critical, because rape in Syria has consequences that far exceed those in the developed world. It's more than a terrible, violent invasion of the victim's body. It's more than a physical, mental, and emotional assault. In Syria, a woman's chastity and honour are among the most highly regarded values in society.
Rape, therefore, is a severe attack on the human dignity and well-being of the victims, their families, and their communities. It leaves women devastated and vulnerable to several forms of ongoing suffering and confronted with a cluster of overwhelming problems. Indeed, raping a Syrian woman effectively means sentencing her to death, whether physically, psychologically, or socially.
Assaulted women may be subjected to honour killings, regardless of the fact that they were assaulted against their will. In addition, they are likely to suffer socio-medical problems, including sexually transmitted diseases. Moreover, victims may be abandoned or rejected by their family or society. If the raped woman happened to be married, her husband might, at best, refuse to touch her again. If she were single, she would be denied the opportunity of ever getting married, since she had lost her virginity, even though it was against her will.
Likewise, women in Syria may even be killed by their own families or commit suicide as a preventive measure to avoid being raped. A report by the International Rescue Committee in New York reveals that one father shot and killed his daughter as they were approached by an armed group, in order to prevent the dishonour of her being sexually assaulted.
As in most internal and international armed conflicts, rape has been a horrific component of the Syrian sectarian war, becoming a widespread weapon of terror and a form of torture used to extract information from rebels and their family members and supporters. The aim of the perpetrators is to destroy the identity of the victims, intimidate them, and tear apart the social fabric of their communities.
The situation for Syrian women and girls is frightening to a degree that we cannot imagine.
Many of the families who have fled the country have done so not simply to avoid shelling, but to protect their women from rape, which is being employed as a weapon of sectarian cleansing, a new conflict-related crime to be added to the long list of crimes against humanity embodied in article 7 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
First-hand information collected from Syrian refugees in Jordan and Lebanon reveals that Syrian women and young girls have been gang-raped and intentionally impregnated by combatants. They have been assaulted in detention and interrogation centres during home raids and searches, often in front of members of their families, and in public at checkpoints and roadblocks. Those who have survived are experiencing a living death behind bars or in refugee camps inside and outside Syria, and continue to be vulnerable to different kinds of exploitation by both friends and foes.
In a heart-wrenching story from the Zaatari refugee camp in Jordan, a father told of how he was forced to surrender his underage daughter to government security forces at a checkpoint after being threatened with the death of the whole family in the car. Syrian women, and men as well, have been systematically subjected to several kinds of wartime sexual violence, including rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, enforced sterilization, sexual torture, sexual terrorism, sexual mutilation, and forced nudity. As if these heinous crimes are not enough, a recent co-authored study with the Hon. Irwin Cotler reveals that the Syrian sectarian war has produced several unprecedented gender-based crimes, which I mention here briefly. I might touch upon them during the discussion.
First, there is arbitrary marriage, in Arabic zawaj ta'assufi. This kind of marriage could be divided into three categories: forced marriage, in Arabic zawaj qasri, where families force their underage daughters to wed early under the pressure of poverty and economic hardship; preventive/protective marriage, in Arabic zawaj wiqa'i, where families force their young female children to get married in order to avoid the stigma of potential rape; and shame marriage, in Arabic zawaj sitr al-'arr, where families force assaulted women and girls to marry even elderly men to restore the “honour of the family”. The second is zawaj al-istimta', and finally, jihad al-nikah, which is the jihad marriage.
In view of the above, and in light of what may be called an international conspiracy of silence with respect to the heinous crimes being committed in Syria's conflict, either by the use of veto, a weapon of obstruction, by major players to suppress any resolution to stop the war or to refer the situation of Syria to the prosecutor of the ICC, or by turning a blind eye to all atrocities committed by all the factions involved, l would like to conclude by making an appeal to the Government of Canada and to all Syrian victims of wartime rape and other forms of sexual violence residing in Canada.
l appeal to the Government of Canada to support an international campaign to end the culture of impunity that protects those who committed rape and other forms of sexual violence in the Syrian conflict, either through accountability measures or by extending a hand of support to survivors directly or indirectly through regional and international working groups.
I also appeal to the Government of Canada to open Canada's doors to more Syrian refugees, and particularly to victims of wartime sexual violence. According to existing data collected from a variety of sources, the government has set a target of only 1,300 refugees, of which about 200 would be government assisted and 1,100 privately sponsored.
Only a few of these refugees have been settled, fewer than 400 between January 2012 and June 2013, and fewer than 20 in 2014.
By contrast, Sweden for example has already welcomed over 14,000 refugees and has given them permanent status.
My appeal to the victims of wartime gender-based crimes residing in Canada is that they try to overcome the stigma associated with these crimes by regarding themselves as wounded combatants rather than as mere victims of sexual violence, as veterans of a just war, rather than a shameful statistic, and to come forward, speak out, and take legal action against their perpetrators under Canada's Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act.
It is a sad truth that victims may refrain from bringing an action against Syrian officials in Canadian courts for fear of vindictive measures if they return to Syria or because they assume that Syrian officials enjoy immunity under Canada's State Immunity Act. Needless to say, that amendment of the State Immunity Act would not only allow victims with a real connection to Canada to pursue civil remedies against perpetrators of war crimes, but also would maximize Canada's role in combating the culture of impunity, and contribute to the prevention of future human rights abuses, including conflict-related gender-based crimes.
Mr. Chair, thank you again for the invitation to testify before your committee today. I am looking forward to taking any questions that you have.