Thank you both for being here.
I would like to join my colleague in commending the efforts of Nevsun in taking steps forward into a more transparent atmosphere in corporate social responsibility.
The burning question I have kind of follows on the heels of my colleague, Mr. Sweet, in terms of testimony that I've heard in the last little while and how terms like “nuance”, “politicization”, and so forth keep creeping back into the discussion. I have to be honest. It does cause me concern because when we start talking that way, for me it's not a clear answer. Yes, not all of life's answers can be clear, but when we're dealing with people's rights, clarity is something that is paramount.
I would like your opinion on why there's such a discrepancy, for lack of a better way of putting it, between what you experienced on the ground in your visits and the various reports from other outside agencies. Part B of that question would be, why do they have such difficulty in getting the kind of access that you got that would, if those statements are true, go a long way to changing the view of these outside agencies?