Thank you.
My name is Staci Haag. I am an independent consultant who has worked in both the NGO and the private sectors, specifically focusing on democracy, governance, and women’s issues for the past nine years or so. I've just returned from 19 months in Afghanistan, where I served as the communication and outreach director for a large USAID-funded project that was focused pretty specifically on governance from a local level.
I would like to start by thanking the committee for offering me the chance to speak. I've been doing the fieldwork for, as I said, nine or ten years, and a lot of times the gap between the people who design the programs and the people who implement the programs is fairly large, so I really appreciate your taking the time to listen to me.
The general status of women in Afghanistan is not good right now. There have been a lot of studies and a lot of statistics. A recent education study showed that the literacy rate overall for the country is 34%, and for women it's 18%. In the rural areas, where 74% of the country lives, the literacy rate for women is as low as 10%, and it's only in the 30% range for men.
Other reports from organizations such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International show that there has been very little practical progress in addressing basic human rights issues for women, including health care, maternal health, and protecting them from violence. But there are a lot of numbers out there, and I understand that you're just starting your work, so as opposed to giving you a lot of numbers that I'm sure you'll be bombarded with as you process those through, I'd like to give you a couple of caveats to keep in mind as you wade through different statistics.
On the first statistic, the first thing to remember is that a lot of the more rosy reports in Afghanistan tend to show progress at a statistical level: we've had a 100%, a 50%, or a 200% increase. That's great, and I don't want to diminish that, but it's important to keep in mind the starting point, which was very, very grim. When you're going from, say, one to two, and you have a 100% increase, the base is very low. When you're looking at that kind of thing, both in terms of progress recently and in terms of programs that are being implemented, just keep that in mind.
The other thing to remember, which is especially important when you're talking about women, is that a lot of numbers you'll hear will be nationwide; however, there is a lot of diversity, both regionally and ethnically, in terms of access for women to health care, jobs, and education. For anything you look at, it's important to keep in mind where they're coming from. Are they coming from the Pashtun community, the Tajik, or the Hazara? It does have an impact in terms of what the starting point is.
My experience personally in Afghanistan is in implementing programs in the primarily Pashtun areas of eastern Afghanistan. There are a lot of different things I've learned, those in Afghanistan and other things, that I think would be helpful in moving forward.
I've been told to keep this fairly short so we can have a lot of questions. I do have some specific ideas that I think would be helpful in terms of looking at programs that support women in Afghanistan going forward; however, I'd like to start with a story about one of the programs I worked on recently.
Here's the short version. A key component of my job was to oversee advocacy and outreach training for local District Development Assembly members in eastern Afghanistan. One of the areas we worked in was Wardak province in the Sayed Abad district. Sayed Abad is a dangerous district in a dangerous province. The education statistics show that schools are being reopened and girls are getting more access. The reality on the ground is that even when the schools are being reopened, parents feel pressured into not sending their girls, and the number of schools being reopened is much lower than the national average.
What we found in Sayed Abad is that one of the things that worked really well was that a group of local women gathered together and ran what was in essence a textbook advocacy campaign. They decided that they wanted their girls going to school in this area, the Tangi Valley, so they got together and created a group.
Then they negotiated with both the elders and the Taliban, and they got in essence permission to reopen schools. They did not have government support yet, so the schools were in people's homes. They had to raise money in the community to pay for teachers, to pay for books. They had to get volunteers so they could hold classes in people's spare rooms.
Over time, the community hopes to get these schools registered and formalized. These aren't the types of schools that are generally promoted or that you read about in the aid projects, because fancy schools and a lot of books often make better visuals and make people feel like they're making a difference. However, I'd argue that when you take this approach, when you go through the community, it gives these schools a much stronger foundation. The simple reason is that schools that have been deemed necessary by the community and that are then approved and maintained by the people have a much stronger foundation. The quality of education may not be the best. The schools won't look like much from the outside. But getting people used to supporting girls' education, and getting girls used to going to school, is a step rooted in community desire and involvement. That's where I think foreign aid should live, especially as it relates to engaging women in countries like Afghanistan.
The above story is so far a success. Girls are going to school. They're lobbying to get books and buildings and formal registration. Things are moving forward. I've had a lot of times when things didn't get that far and the bulk of my effort was spent finding women to participate. Then, once I did get a group, they would feel intimidated and threatened and would back off. I'd spend entire programs going through that cycle over and over and over again. It is a challenge, but the first challenge before you get to that is often finding the women who are willing to participate.
With that story and those thoughts in mind, I'd like close, before we go to questions, with a few things that I think would be most helpful in terms of supporting women in Afghanistan.
First, I think any program should be rooted in advocacy and governance skills. These are harder programs to implement. They are harder programs to monitor. When you spend money to build a building or a road, it's easy to track progress. Advocacy and governance skills are a lot harder to track. They wax and wane in popularity. But giving people the skills, as we did in Sayed Abad, provides a much more sustainable base on which to build these buildings in the future with the community.
Second, any follow-on activities would be rooted in very specific campaigns giving people the ability and support to advocate to Parliament, or to work within Parliament, to pass legislation.
The third point, however, is that complementary programming must exist and have a long-term focus. The status of women's rights in Afghanistan is a great example. It has shown us that passing good laws means nothing without extensive follow-up, especially in terms of implementation. It is especially important to work on how you're going to implement and enforce legislatively post-victory.
Fourth, although this depends on different programs, the content of any advocacy or legislative advocacy initiatives needs to be the design of the people working on it. They may not be things that outsiders think are important, but if you give people a start on what they choose, they'll have much more investment in this.
Finally, any program should be diverse in community. There can be a very isolationist tendency in aid work to view every country in a vacuum. I think there is a balance between this and the other extreme to treat all people exactly the same. The difference lies in giving local activists and leaders the opportunity to learn from others who have faced similar challenges. Creating a peer and trainer network for advice and feedback is critical to the long-term success of advocacy groups, especially in countries where the ability to self-govern is a recent development.
That is my general overview. I'd like to see who has any questions on that, or any follow-ups.