Thank you very much to the witnesses for coming today and illuminating us on a very tragic story, and of course, the very tragic outcomes and legacy that are happening in Rwanda.
Your comments actually took me off my original course of questions that I'd like to ask. I'm very interested in the Stabilization and Reconstruction Task Force. I recently read the book The Locust Effect. The author of the book's premise is that aid without security means that much of it is diminished by those who would seek to harm people afterwards.
In DFATD's moving forward, particularly since you mentioned START, are we looking at more innovative ways to try to make sure that security is in place first, as we help nations with aid? Are we looking, for example, for more of a commitment and an obligation by the governments of the individual states that they'll provide security as we give aid?