Maybe I can kick off with an answer. In the immediate aftermath of any humanitarian crisis, there is a robust vulnerability assessment done by our partners. If these children and women were considered vulnerable, then they would absolutely have had access to humanitarian assistance, absolutely.
If you are asking about the particular case of Rwanda, I was actually the desk officer between 1998 and 2001 on the humanitarian desk for the Great Lakes, and there was no discrimination whatsoever between children who were born as a result of rape, versus children who were orphans for other reasons, versus female-headed households. The lens the humanitarian community puts on when they're approaching these situations is indeed vulnerability. That's what they look at, because they are upholding the humanitarian principles of neutrality, impartiality, and independence. If there's need, they will respond based on the need.