I would rather be further along by far than we are. Honduras, from my perspective, represents the kind of instability we saw, as I said, 10 years ago in Guatemala. They've made major progress in Guatemala. We are not where I would like us to be. I think we have made progress on certain pieces. For example, there are now in place quite a number of investigative teams that go out, for example, to the murder scenes and they are collecting evidence properly now. They are getting the physical evidence. They are processing it properly. That piece is working well. I think it's a major achievement.
Where we've had trouble has been in the follow-up investigation piece because of the weakness of the police in terms of their capacity. That is why we believe the creation of ATIC will actually allow us to move that agenda forward. They tend to rotate the investigators, and sometimes they're just pulled away. Doing that has not created the stability they need around investigation in that country. So the response of the Ministerio Público has been to say, “Look, if we can't do it that way, we're going to do it this other way”.
This is the same issue that Guatemala faced, as I said, 10 years ago when they said they had to strengthen investigation. I'm encouraged by the fact that they have the money and they've hired all the people. They've all been vetted. They're people we work with. They're people we've been working with around how to create this.
I'm hoping that starting in January we're going to see investigations being done in a far more effective way. They of course have turned to Canada for help in training these people. Some of the people have already been trained by us, and of course we've been talking to them about what needs to be done next.
So I would say no to your question about investigation: we haven't gotten to where we need to be, but I am thinking now that the conditions are changing and I do believe we can get more done on that road.