The reason I ask that is partly because we actually, genuinely, don't have a good way of conceptualizing this here, so we just have to ask. Also, it strikes me that the kinds of needs you have are going to change over your lifetime. Obviously some of the issues relating to reconciliation with a child of rape are issues that were either dealt with well or poorly 18, 19, or 20 years ago, and now we're presumably dealing with a woman who was raped, became pregnant, and had a child. The child is now in their late teens. I think, in fact, all the kids would be within a very narrow range of time if we're dealing with the direct victims of the genocide.
I guess that is one thought, where you actually see a generation that is very clearly defined in terms of the children as a result, not necessarily the mothers. With the children I would think there would be a narrow band in which you could identify who those people are.
This actually raises a question. Would it be the case that among people in that age range, essentially people who are 19 years old, a substantial proportion of the population of Rwandans of that age are more or less defined by their age in the eyes of those around them as being people who are likely to have been the product of rape?