Thank you.
I have a further question. I wanted to follow up on Mr. Sweet's earlier line of questioning and on the very first thing that was in your testimony. This relates to the women who had the experience of being confined, subject to sexual abuse, and then were dropped off in front of a relative after they thought they were being taken out for execution. In trying to posit a model that would explain this, nothing, not even horrible human rights abuses, happens without a reason.
It occurred to me that, if the goal was just to sexually abuse the women, it would be more convenient to dispose of them by killing them or just keep them perpetually imprisoned than to release them to relatives. There must be a value to those who are doing this in having the knowledge relatively widespread that if their wives or daughters have been imprisoned and the individuals are, then, approached to be informed as to where their loved one is, they would be aware of the kind of abuse that they've been subject to. That would create the same kind of incentive as a relative of a kidnapping victim's having an ear arrive in the mail would feel.