My perception is no. I think we've seen a change of vocabulary without a change in behaviour.
La Rochefoucauld said, “hypocrisy is a tribute that vice pays to virtue”, and I think what we're seeing now is a different language, but we're seeing the same level of human rights violations without any real abatement. I think some of the instances that I mentioned illustrate that hypocrisy. Rouhani cancelled Ahmadinejad's Holocaust denial conference, and then had another one, his own, a year later.
There's a whole pattern like that in the Palestinian-Israeli peace negotiations. He said whatever the Palestinians would accept, we would accept, but then he said Israel is an old wound that has to be removed. So instead of speaking unequivocally, he's speaking out of both sides of his mouth. If you look at the number of people in jail, the number of people executed, the problems that Iran is posing to its opposition, including the Jewish community, I don't see any movement. We do have these Interpol arrest warrants from Argentina. I don't see Iran cooperating with those arrest warrants.
I think the problem remains what it was. Hypocrisy, I suppose, initially poses a problem because, is he telling the truth? We have to give him some time to evaluate, but I think the regime under Rouhani has gone on long enough that we can make that evaluation and call him to account for the regime's deeds rather than just for what he's been saying.