If you look at the overall statistics, not good; some individual cases get some movement, and the sanctions....
Unfortunately, as I say, we have a wide menu of agenda items to pursue in dealing with human rights violations in Iran. What's taken the priority, perhaps understandably, is the development of the nuclear weapons capability of Iran.
My own view is that the sanctions have had an impact in bringing Iran to the negotiating table and perhaps slowing the development of the nuclear weapons capability. But to a certain extent there's been a trade-off in the international community between human rights and the nuclear weapons capability. The focus has been on the nuclear weapons capability, and as a result, they're not prepared to accelerate the sanctions or to pin them directly to human rights. They've been pinning them more directly to the development of the nuclear weapons capability.
The sanctions, I would say, have been useful. I note that Mr. Cotler has a private member's bill that deals specifically with reporting on sanctions, which I'd draw to your attention. The sanctions have been useful, but they're only one weapon in an armoury of combatting human rights violations. I don't think we can rely on them alone.