I think that both approaches were significant, and I think, actually—this may seem to be a curious thing to say—the approaches were quite effective. I think that the decision of your Prime Minister early on to say, “Look, unless you deliver, I'm not going to come”, was important. I wish actually that, in fact, other countries had done that. I was unhappy personally that David Cameron had so early on said he was going. I think that kind of undermined the pressure that could have been built up in advance of the Commonwealth meeting for some kind of progress and some kind of improvement.
I support both of them, in a sense. I didn't support my Prime Minister's decision to announce that he was going so early. Having said that, it is certainly true that he did speak out quite boldly and quite firmly when he was there. Given that the meeting was going to go ahead, this also helped, and he then, I think, was clear and unequivocal in the concerns he raised.
That's not a very satisfactory answer, but I think in a sense he did, if you like, in my personal view, redeem his decision to go by raising the issues very firmly, and given that it was then happening, that was useful. But I would have hoped that more people would have supported your Prime Minister's position earlier on and used that not just as a kind of negative, “I'm not going”, but to use that as a way of exacting pressure.