I think what it's done is to make it painfully aware to the president and his closest advisers that this is an issue that's not going to go away. Their strategy of hoping it would go away, I think they must now recognize is failing. Whether it has convinced them that they need to take genuine steps is something I can't judge. What's clear is that they've taken some superficial steps that have been criticized. Other human rights experts whom you've already met or who will testify before you can go into the detail about the inadequacies of the measures announced.
For example, one real concession has to do with the census of death. This has been a long-standing demand and they've actually agreed to do this. If it's done seriously and fairly, it will be a very important thing. That was done in the wake of the Commonwealth meeting. I think the fact that it was a public relations disaster has shown the government that this issue is one they need to take seriously. But they may choose to take it seriously by adopting another strategy of obfuscation and may just look to get around it in a different way than they've been trying up to now, as opposed to genuinely addressing it.