There was another question I wanted to ask you, but it may be too broad. We see on the one hand the militarization of the Sri Lankan political system and economy—the odd juxtaposition of urban development with the military in a single department is a peculiar one, to say the least—and on the other hand, we see the president relying on the party system for power, as you've said.
I'm just wondering if this is a situation where the support of the military is now essential to maintaining political power and that they therefore must effectively be put in a position where they can be economically rewarded through the rejigging of the power structure. Or is this not the case?