I have a follow-up question based on what you've mentioned, Senator.
You're correct that Sri Lanka is not a party to the treaty for the International Criminal Court, and that of course raises the question of how the ICC could exercise jurisdiction if Sri Lanka is not a state party. There is one way in which it could, and that is if the UN Security Council would refer the Sri Lankan situation to the ICC, as was done in the case of Sudan, even though Sudan was not a state party to the ICC.
Would that possibility exist in the case of Sri Lanka or would there likely be a veto exercised by a country like China in these circumstances. Do you think it's worth a try if for no other reason than to even embarrass those who would veto that kind of reference?