Mr. Sweet moved a motion about the letter of appreciation to Scott Reid, the previous chair for the last decade or a good chunk of it. Do we have unanimous consent on that?
(Motion agreed to)
Great. That's our first item of business then.
In terms of the issue of human rights advocates who may be in town coming to committee, certainly in principle it seems like a favourable idea. I think it would probably come back in terms of consensus on an individual basis who those individual speakers are and whether there is consensus to having them appear. I think if that consensus exists, that can either be done off-line or during a meeting of the committee prior to their attendance. If we have that consensus and everybody is in favour of it, I don't see this as an issue, keeping in mind the limited number of sessions between now and the summer recess.
Are there any other points of order or business from the floor? No?
As I said in my preamble or my spiel, I think we're going to postpone Thursday's meeting and instead meet a week from today at the same time and same place. Between now and then, we can connect off-line on some possible topics and areas of study. I think that would be great. We can discuss this after the meeting, but I think we can come back in next Tuesday with a direction on a study that we want to start the ball rolling with.
Yes.