Thank you very much.
Mr. Dubowitz, my question is for you. Like all my colleagues around the table, I share a real concern about the human rights situation in Iran, but I'm also concerned when the argument is made that regime change ought to be the focus in Iran.
We have seen what regime change meant in Iraq in 2003 and what it meant for the people of Iraq from a human rights perspective, but also the wider region.
Can you comment on the following? You wrote along with Reuel Marc Gerecht for Bloomberg a few years back. This is what you said—and I quote this also, in light of the fact that you're counselling the Canadian government to take a stronger approach, when it comes to imposing sanctions on Iran.
You said, as follows:
If we are going to pursue tougher international sanctions against Iran, and we should, the goal should be regime change in Iran not stopping proliferation. In fact, regime change would make the idea of an Iranian bomb far more tolerable.
Can you explain what you mean by that?