Thank you.
The Kerch bridge was mentioned in the context of creating a land connection from the Russian mainland to the Crimean peninsula. An important point is that we have to consider sanctions of different sorts. There are Magnitsky sanctions, but also sanctions that target companies—the companies that were involved in the engineering and the construction—and many of these companies are closely associated with Putin himself. Perhaps that's something that should be considered.
There is another aspect to it. Everyone sees the land bridge, but would you not agree that Russia, through the construction of this bridge, has also territorially expanded? It's not on land, though; it's the Sea of Azov. As the bridge was completed, they moved five of their biggest Caspian warships through the Volga-Don lock system into the Sea of Azov. They have a limited coastline in the Sea of Azov, but in fact they have taken territorial control of the Sea of Azov at this point in time. It is a territorial expansion once again that Russia is engaged in.
Would you agree with that premise?