It's a really challenging question. I think there are examples of projects that have been undertaken to address short-term risks and needs. I'm going to give you an example of one that was undertaken by colleagues from the U.S. Institute of Peace. They have a project that works on fostering reconciliation between different religious minorities [Technical difficulty--Editor] and kind of at-risk or vulnerable, moments of vulnerability. One example was Tikrit, where there was the potential for there be, in the wake of a massacre, a kind of explosion of violence. They deployed a rapid response team of local moderators, who were able to work between communities to address their grievances and de-escalate the tension.
We need to see that essentially on a much broader scale. In my testimony I mentioned, for example, tensions between Christians and Shabaks over property. That's a flashpoint that we know exists, and as people start to return home, we can anticipate that there will be more tension. You could invest in local-level reconciliation efforts to try to build trust between those communities. You can invest in projects, right now, for people who were displaced in Erbil and Dohuk, bringing together leaders of religious communities, or focusing on the promotion of education targeting youth and children living in displaced persons camps or in various other forms of shelter, to bring them together in a form of dialogue. There are Sunni Arabs who are living in displacement in the KRG as well.
There are lots of opportunities to actually start the dialogue. It's just not happening, and it isn't being scaled up where it is happening currently.