Certainly. The infrastructure of South Sudan itself, even if this weren't all going on, is difficult. There are some 200 kilometres of paved roads in the country, so that makes any heavy movement difficult.
With our rapid response mechanism, we work together with the World Food Programme to have helicopters that will go into these areas. You find an area near a village, and as our teams are coming down, you have to coordinate all the time with the different armed groups to make sure that you don't get shot at.
Our teams will stay in these areas for about a week. We run mobile clinics. We do screening for malnourished children and conduct vaccination campaigns. There are sometimes still teachers in the communities. When there are teachers there, we leave behind education materials, but we always have to be ready to go right away. Having to do it this way, having to take things in by helicopter, increases the cost astronomically rather than if we were able to get it there by boat going up the Nile or other ways. It makes it expensive, which means it's extremely hard to sustain.
There's a political situation going on here, but for these women and children, I know when I cut myself I want a bandage on it to help me get through, and we know this is what we're able to do for these women and children now. We also know that any humanitarian crisis needs a political solution. That's the ultimate solution we need. We can be there in the meantime, and we are, but we need a political solution.