I'd make one point. As you know, because your Prime Minister was co-hosting the Leaders' Summit on Refugees last September in New York with President Obama about the refugees and the migration compact, at some point we were trying to identify the best practices among different countries in terms of receiving, hosting, integrating, and giving livelihood opportunities to refugees. You will be surprised to hear—or perhaps not—that the first country that came to mind to all of the UNHCR officers was Uganda, because Uganda for years has been a country.... Uganda has its own human rights issues, but in terms of accepting refugees, it has been a model in terms of local integration, access to land and access to schooling and education.
It started with their own IDP population from the Lord's Resistance Army 20 years ago. It was understood very rapidly in a very smart way that there was a connection between development and the humanitarian response: the first thing that is on the agenda of everyone today.
They understood that by getting humanitarian interest, they could also get the development actors to come and develop the country in much longer and sustainable terms.
This is what's happening in northern Uganda. Northern Uganda was a place where there was very little happening in terms of economic productivity, and so on. They needed, to some extent, some workforce to be able to harvest the land, and so on. By using this double approach of humanitarian and development money they are able to respond to the protection needs and respect international law in accepting refugees, but in a smart way develop their own country for the very long term.