Perhaps I can clarify that a bit. The Canadian assistance that goes to India is relatively constrained. It focuses largely on big-picture issues, working through the multilateral organizations to help India and perhaps states, and so forth, to build capacity to be able to deal with the issue themselves. The Indian authorities and many of the states are very much seized with the issue. Our focus, to the extent that we haven't...because this is not a major priority for Canada. Among other things, we had not had a formal aid program in India since 2009, as mentioned, so it tends to be at the more institutional level where it's really required. The Indians have a very significant process in place. They are parties to the protocol and convention and want to address this issue, and of course they have a free press that is very much seized with this issue.
The points that were made about the Canada fund—which is actually quite a small amount of money that is just run out of the Canadian high commission—are quite specific. If I understand what you're getting at, namely, whether we are dealing with grassroots problems, I think the proper answer is actually no. We're trying to focus on capacity and in a much smaller way to focus on individual areas where we might be able to do something. But as I'm sure your secretariat will be informing you, there is an enormous effort by non-governmental organizations, both Indian and non-Indian, at the grassroots level, but that's not really where we concentrate our focus.
I hope that helps clarify it.