Perhaps there is, but to give you a bit of a context here, let me say that the protocol on trafficking in persons defines four tiers of countries in terms of how they are addressing the problem. From one to four, in descending order of how much effort they're putting in, Canada is a tier one country, but so is India.
The Indians are putting a lot of effort into this, it's quite clear. Much of the statistical problem comes from the fact that this is essentially crime of an organized fashion, whether it's formally organized crime or not, and is very difficult to detect. One thing the Indians are trying to do in their own plan of action under the protocol is to get a better sense of it.
My sense, and I stand to be corrected on this, is that funding for it is not actually a problem. The Indians are focused on it. They have access to money, funds coming from international organizations and elsewhere. I think, as you were pointing out earlier, much of the issue comes at the grassroots level, and that's where there's a very vibrant NGO focus.
It's not a perfect response to your question, but this gives a little context.