Sure, I can answer that.
In broad terms what the Bahá'í community would like to see, or what I could recommend that our government and elected officials explore, is raising awareness of the situation of the Bahá'ís in Iran; condemning the human rights violations quietly and publicly; maintaining scrutiny, not the least through the UN resolution; reprimanding non-compliance under international law and non-cooperation with the UN mechanism; and insisting on change in our dialogue with Iran. As that pertains to the Bahá'ís' example of insisting on change and testing the sincerity of the government in a dialogue on human rights, it could take the form of releasing the Bahá'í seven immediately without any conditions. It could be rescinding the 1991 memorandum, which I referred to in my testimony, which really is a blueprint for the elimination of the Bahá'í community in Iran. It could be allowing Bahá'ís to attend university and calling for an end to the incitement to hatred, the list goes on.
From my experience, governments and elected officials have a multitude of spaces to explore these actions. It could be with their counterparts, with other countries. It could be quietly, publicly, informally, formally, bilaterally, multilaterally, and at various levels of government too.