Thank you, sir. Back in 2015, we gave a team of people from Yale Law School several years' worth of documentation and asked them to approach this question about whether the crime of genocide may have been perpetrated in Rakhine State. This was before the current wave of violence. Their conclusion was that the elements of genocide do appear to be in place in Rakhine State and may be in place in Rakhine State. From our perspective, there would have to be and should be a credible international independent investigation that would ideally lead to some aspect of accountability. An investigation such as this in a court could and should help us understand what specific international crimes have been perpetrated and by whom.
My personal view is that I do see evidence on the ground that would support the crime of genocide. Particularly, you mentioned the prohibited acts. Essentially, we know the Rohingya represent a protected group under the genocide convention, which is the first element. The second element is that some of these prohibited acts would have to have occurred, which of course they have. The third is of course the intent to destroy, in whole or in part. In some of these places, given the totality of the context right now, it's very difficult to come to conclusions other than the fact that there are perpetrators who are intending to destroy at least part of the Rohingya community.