Thank you. I have one more question and then I'll give the rest of my time to my colleague, if there's anything else.
Mr. Smith, Mr. Ramadan mentioned that we should use the word “genocide”. I have the United Nations website here in front of me. There are two main components. One is that there needs to be an “intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”.
The second part is physical:
(a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Would your organization also use the term, in this case, in Myanmar, of genocide against the Rohingya?